Bridging Across Borders: Collaborative Strategies for Academic and Professional Success in AI-era

Nkechi M Obodozie & Chukwu Kenechukwu Origin Posted on
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64010/GXLA8964

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) and globalization reshape academic and professional landscapes, effective collaboration across disciplines, institutions, and cultures becomes increasingly vital. This paper draws on Cultural Intelligence (CQ) theory and Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) to propose a cross-level framework for AI-mediated collaboration. We show how AI can enhance collective learning and performance when integrated with inclusive, human-centered practices. The framework addresses ethical considerations and promotes equity, adaptability, and continuous learning in collaborative settings. Implications for leadership, cross-functional teams, and organizational learning are discussed.AI education with student needs and evolving industry expectations.Bloom framework can add value, in different ways, to instructional design and assessment.

Bridging Across Borders: Critical Role of Collaboration in Navigating the AI Era 

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into industries and educational systems is fundamentally transforming the way we collaborate. AI technologies promise to revolutionize teamwork and decision-making, yet their implementation presents complex challenges, particularly around inclusivity, equity, and ethical responsibility(Chalutz-Ben Gal, 2023; Hughes & Davis, 2024). As AI systems increasingly mediate collaboration, it is crucial to explore how these technologies can foster more effective and inclusive interactions across diverse cultural contexts. This paper addresses these challenges by applying Cultural Intelligence (CQ) and Soft Systems Methodology (SSM), two complementary frameworks that provide insights into navigating the social and systemic complexities of AI-enhanced collaboration (Checkland, 1981; Earley & Ang, 2003; Ang et al., 2007; Ravasi et al., 2024). Specifically, we propose a multi-level framework to guide the development of AI systems that not only maximize technical efficiency but also promote equity, inclusivity, and ethical decision-making in collaborative work environments.

While much of the existing research (Anthony et al., 2024; Fernandez et al., 2024; Lafkas, 2024; Ma et al., 2024; McLees et al., 2024; Russell & Norvig, 2020) has focused on AI’s technical potential (e.g., enhancing productivity or optimizing processes), few studies have explored its social implications, such as how AI tools influence human relationships, team dynamics, and cultural inclusivity. These gaps are especially evident in understanding how diverse groups (e.g., gender, race, age) engage with AI technologies in collaborative settings. As AI increasingly shapes academic and professional environments, from AI-driven tutoring systems to workforce analytics, failure to address these social dimensions risks perpetuating existing inequities and biases(Chalutz-Ben Gal, 2023; Muhdi, 2023; Rosani et al., 2024). This paper seeks to bridge this gap by proposing a framework that integrates both Cultural Intelligence and Soft Systems Methodology, offering strategies for building collaborative capacity in AI-enhanced work environments. The central question we address is: What collaborative strategies and competencies are essential for navigating AI-driven transformations in an inclusive and responsible manner? How can we prepare students for a present and a future shaped by intelligent systems without compromising critical human values—critical thinking, collaboration, and ethical responsibility?

We argue that successful engagement with AI requires not only technical adaptation but also the development of collaborative capacity—the ability to bridge interdisciplinary, cultural, and technological divides. This necessitates expanding the concept of collaboration beyond teamwork to encompass socio-technical integration, ethical deliberation, and cultural fluency (Roberto, 2024; Salas et al., 2024).  Through this study, we contribute to management literature in two ways:

  • Integrating Cultural Intelligence into Digital Collaboration: We explore the role of CQ in AI-mediated environments, emphasizing the importance of cross-cultural competencies for successful collaboration.
  • Proposing a Cross-Level Framework for Collaborative Capacity: We offer a framework that spans individual, team, institutional, and societal levels, outlining strategies for fostering inclusive, ethical AI adoption.

By synthesizing insights from management, education, technology, and organizational behavior, this paper offers a holistic, theory-driven approach to understanding and enabling AI-driven collaboration. In the following sections, we will review literature on AI and collaboration before presenting our framework, recommended strategies, and future research agenda.

Literature Review

AI, Collaboration, and the Imperative for Inclusive Design

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education and knowledge work is transforming how individuals learn, collaborate, and solve complex problems. AI tools—such as ChatGPT, CoPilot, Napkin AI, NotebookLM, Grammarly, Zoom, Teams, etc.—enhance cognitive processes, personalize learning, and streamline collaboration across geographies and disciplines. In both academic and organizational contexts, these technologies facilitate knowledge exchange, automate routine tasks, and support real-time decision-making, fundamentally reshaping collaborative practices ( Abbas et al., 2024; Purdy, 2024; Roberto, 2024). AI-driven platforms in education promote adaptive learning by tailoring content to individual needs, offering real-time feedback, and reducing administrative burden (Tuomi, 2018; Slimi, 2023). These capabilities foster inclusive learning environments and help students develop both subject knowledge and fluency in emerging digital tools increasingly vital for employability in AI-augmented workplaces (University of Bridgeport, 2023; Shahzad et al., 2024). Concurrently, educators use AI to design learner-centered curricula, analyze classroom data, and enhance instructional quality(Zeivots & Shalavin, 2024).

In professional settings, agentic AI supports cross-functional teams by independently managing workflows and enabling data-driven decision-making(Lawler et al., 2025). Collaboration tools powered by AI facilitate interdisciplinary exchange, distributed teamwork, enhance decision-making, and automate routine tasks (L. Thomas & Ambrosini, 2021). Yet this technological shift also introduces tensions around ethics, bias, and the potential erosion of critical human capabilities, including creativity, empathy, and judgment(Chalutz-Ben Gal, 2023; McLees et al., 2024). Increasingly, we see an erosion of soft skills while we upskill technical competencies to match the proliferation of AI tools, since the integration of AI into collaborative workflows introduces new demands. 

As we adopt these AI systems and tools, we must also champion the development of competencies not only in using emerging technologies but also in navigating interdisciplinary and cross-functional settings. In the industry, cross-functional collaboration—bringing together professionals from IT, operations, and marketing—ensures that complex AI challenges are addressed from multiple vantage points (Lawler et al., 2025). Similarly, interdisciplinary collaboration, combining insights, is essential to ensure that AI tools reflect broader human and societal concerns(L. Thomas & Ambrosini, 2021; R. J. Thomas, 2011). Applying this in our pedagogy, we can foster learning and diffusion of knowledge, competencies through collaborative learning powered and facilitated by AI systems. These interactive learning approaches demand not only technical fluency but also cultural intelligence and systemic thinking.

Reframing Collaboration in the Age of AI: Cultural and Systemic Perspectives

While AI tools promise greater efficiency and connectivity, they also raise complex social, ethical, and cultural questions. In this context, collaboration must be reconceptualized not just as a technical process, but as a dynamic, culturally embedded, and ethically sensitive practice. Cultural Intelligence (CQ) and Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) offer valuable perspectives for understanding and shaping collaboration in the AI era.

Cultural Intelligence and Inclusive Collaboration: Cultural Intelligence (CQ), developed by Earley and Ang (2003), refers to an individual’s ability to function effectively across culturally diverse contexts. In AI-enhanced collaboration, CQ plays a critical role in ensuring that interactions remain inclusive and respectful, especially in global or cross-functional teams. As AI systems increasingly mediate communication and decision-making, there is a growing need for culturally aware design and implementation practices (Ang et al., 2015). CQ enables teams to recognize cultural differences in how AI is perceived, used, and trusted. For example, in high power distance cultures, AI may be viewed as an authority, while in low power distance cultures, it may be seen as a tool to support human agency. These cultural nuances impact team dynamics, user adoption, and the ethical use of AI in collaborative settings. Integrating CQ into AI education and workforce development fosters the global competencies necessary for responsible collaboration across borders.

Soft Systems Methodology- a sociotechnical integration: Soft Systems Methodology (SSM), introduced by Checkland (1981), provides a systemic approach to addressing the ambiguous and multifaceted challenges associated with AI integration. SSM focuses on the interdependence between social and technical elements within organizations, making it well-suited for understanding the socio-technical nature of AI-enhanced collaboration.

Rather than viewing AI as a standalone tool, through SSM, we encourage stakeholders to see it as part of an evolving system involving people, values, processes, and technologies. Its participatory and iterative approach allows for the inclusion of diverse voices, designers, users, educators, and students, ensuring that AI adoption reflects collective needs and ethical standards. SSM helps identify hidden tensions in human-machine interaction and promotes solutions that are technically robust and socially legitimate.

Rethinking Educational and Collaborative Capacity in the Age of AI

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education presents both a powerful opportunity and a complex challenge. As AI systems rapidly evolve, they are reshaping how individuals learn, collaborate, and prepare for the labor market. Yet this transformation is not without consequences. Scholars have raised concerns about ethical dilemmas, threats to academic integrity, job displacement, the urgent need for workforce reskilling, and the perpetuation of algorithmic bias(Chalutz-Ben Gal, 2023; Hughes & Davis, 2024; McLees et al., 2024; Roberto, 2024). These complexities underscore that the transformative promise of AI cannot be realized without strategic foresight and inclusive governance.

Within higher education, the implications are far-reaching. The University of Bridgeport (2023) highlights that equipping graduates for an AI-driven world necessitates rethinking educational policies, learning environments, and instructional models. In parallel, Shahzad et al. (2024) emphasize AI’s potential to enhance student success and well-being, suggesting its role in fostering more equitable, globally harmonized learning experiences. These insights point to a broader imperative: integrating AI into education requires cross-sector collaboration to ensure that it advances, not undermines human development and societal equity.

A key response to these challenges is the growing emphasis on cross-functional and interdisciplinary collaboration. The complexity of AI systems demands diverse expertise and collective problem-solving, making it essential to dismantle traditional silos between disciplines and professions(Ceurvorst et al., 2024; Ravasi et al., 2024). As evidenced in our own study, collaboration among faculty from varied regions and institutions fostered the development of critical competencies and adaptive learning. This mirrors a broader shift in organizational and academic contexts, where effective teamwork, especially under conditions of uncertainty, has become central to innovation and resilience (Salas et al., 2024). Tools such as Microsoft Applications (Teams), Zoom, Asana, and Google Docs exemplify this shift, offering integrated support for cross-functional and virtual collaboration. These platforms reduce traditional barriers by facilitating fluid communication and coordination among dispersed team members, enabling real-time knowledge sharing across disciplines and geographies, breaking down traditional silos. 

Cross-functional collaboration and interdisciplinary collaboration are vital for generating novel insights and comprehensive solutions by leveraging diverse knowledge bases(Ceurvorst et al., 2024; Lawler et al., 2025; Ravasi et al., 2024; L. Thomas & Ambrosini, 2021). Collaboration between academia and industry further enhances this dynamic, bridging the gap between theory and application (L. Thomas & Ambrosini, 2021). Moreover, international, AI-enabled collaborations are reshaping education by promoting global competencies and cultural intelligence among learners.

Interdisciplinary engagement is essential for addressing AI’s ethical, legal, and social dimensions, enabling the co-creation of frameworks grounded in transparency, fairness, and justice (Purdy, 2024; Rosani et al., 2024).  For such collaborations to succeed, organizations must cultivate open dialogue, mutual respect, and shared understanding. Structured platforms for knowledge exchange and conflict resolution are vital for building resilient collaborative ecosystems, especially in navigating the complexity of the AI era(L. Thomas & Ambrosini, 2021; R. J. Thomas, 2011). 

However, collaboration—particularly across global and interdisciplinary settings—is not without its challenges. Cultural and linguistic barriers, time zone differences, misaligned goals, and infrastructural disparities often hinder coordination and communication (Ceurvorst et al., 2024; Ravasi et al., 2024). In our own collaboration on this paper, we encountered technical issues and unequal access to resources. While tools like Microsoft Teams and OneDrive aided communication, underlying challenges persisted. Effective collaboration in such contexts demands cultural sensitivity, adaptability, and professionalism.

Further, juggling multiple teams and tasks can amplify collaboration difficulties. It may lead to conflict, perceptions of free-riding, and difficulty recognizing individual contributions (Bavel & Kriska, 2024; Ravasi et al., 2024). In hybrid teams, reduced social cues from digital interactions require new ways of interpreting team dynamics and sustaining engagement (Hughes & Davis, 2024). Online settings can also encourage transactional attitudes toward networking, limiting the development of trust and social capital.

To navigate these challenges, we as leaders and educators must implement clear communication protocols, promote regular interaction, and foster a culture of respect and shared purpose (Hincapie & Hill, 2024; L. Thomas & Ambrosini, 2021). Building cultural intelligence, understanding and adapting to different cultural contexts, is critical for effective global collaboration (Hincapie & Hill, 2024; Petriglieri, 2025). The COVID-19 pandemic reinforced the urgency of mastering virtual collaboration, highlighting the need for intentional, inclusive, and adaptive strategies to support remote teams(Hughes & Davis, 2024; Kuvshinikov, 2022; Muhdi, 2023).

A Multilevel Framework for AI-Enabled Collaboration and Strategies to Enhance Learning

As AI continues to shape education, it is essential to understand the multilevel dynamics of collaboration within this context. At the core of successful AI-enabled collaboration lies the need for integration across technological, institutional, and interpersonal levels. Cultural Intelligence (CQ) and Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) as complementary capacities account for these multilevel dynamics, which are critical in fostering environments where AI can enhance both collaboration and learning. 

At the institutional level, universities and organizations must develop policies that support collaborative AI initiatives, including the infrastructure to facilitate seamless communication and resource sharing. The integration of AI tools, such as learning management systems, project management platforms, and AI-assisted tutoring, provides the backbone for these collaborations. These tools bridge geographic and cultural gaps, ensuring that diverse perspectives can be effectively integrated into the learning process.

At the interpersonal level, AI enhances collaboration by personalizing learning experiences and enabling global teamwork. AI supports collaborative projects by providing real-time feedback, organizing tasks, and suggesting resources, allowing students to engage deeply with the material (McLees et al., 2024). Educators should design strategies that integrate AI ethically, encouraging students to use technology to support, not replace, critical thinking and collaboration(Anthony et al., 2024; Roberto, 2024; Zeivots & Shalavin, 2024). Effective strategies include team-based projects, peer-to-peer learning, and engaged scholarships, which connect theory to practice. These methods encourage students to engage deeply with the material, hone critical thinking skills, and develop their problem-solving abilities (Bavel & Kriska, 2024; Hincapie & Hill, 2024), while AI tools ensure that no student is left behind by adapting to individual learning styles (McLees et al., 2024). AI also enhances collaboration by improving institutional operations, preparing students for an AI-driven workforce (Frey & Osborne, 2013).

To optimize AI’s potential in educational collaborations, educators should also encourage ethical AI use by designing assignments and assessments that promote the responsible integration of technology (Anthony et al., 2024; Roberto, 2024; Zeivots & Shalavin, 2024). By fostering a culture of ethical AI usage, students learn how to engage with AI not as a crutch but as an empowering tool for intellectual growth. Moreover, the collaborative environment should focus on human-centered practices, emphasizing the development of socio-emotional skills such as communication, empathy, and adaptability.

In practice, engaged scholarship is one strategy that fosters deeper collaboration between researchers, practitioners, and students. This model connects theoretical knowledge with practical application, often through partnerships with industry, government, and community stakeholders  (L. Thomas & Ambrosini, 2021). Engaged scholarship enhances the relevance of educational programs by ensuring that students are not only learning from textbooks but are actively involved in solving real-world problems with the help of AI.

Additionally, AI facilitates the development of cultural intelligence, enabling students to work across borders and engage in global collaborations. In this AI-powered landscape, educators must foster ethical AI use and focus on human-centered collaboration to build the skills students need for the future. Virtual platforms (such as Microsoft Teams, Zoom, Asana, and Google Docs) powered by AI allow students from diverse cultural and educational backgrounds to connect and work together in ways that traditional classroom settings cannot(Green et al., 2025). This cross-border collaboration fosters the development of cultural intelligence, a critical skill in today’s interconnected world. It also helps students cultivate the adaptability required for future careers in an increasingly globalized, AI-driven workforce(Anthony et al., 2024; Green et al., 2025). In parallel with these conceptual frameworks, advances in collaborative technologies are reshaping how work and learning occur in practice. 

Summarily, successful AI-enabled collaboration relies on a balance of technical tools, human interaction, and ethical practices. By implementing AI strategically, institutions can create dynamic learning environments that equip students for the challenges of a rapidly evolving world.

From Framework to Action: Human–AI Collaboration and Ecosystem Building

Building on the multilevel framework for AI-enabled collaboration, it becomes evident that technological advancement alone is not sufficient. The foundation of successful integration rests on the ability of humans and AI to work collaboratively, combining their respective strengths toward shared goals. While AI offers speed, efficiency, and data-driven insights, humans contribute critical thinking, ethical judgment, and emotional intelligence. This partnership must be purposefully designed. AI should augment, not replace, human capabilities. This human–AI collaboration is essential in academic and professional contexts alike. 

As AI becomes more embedded in our daily operations and learning environments, resisting its adoption is no longer viable. Rather, we must embrace its benefits while mitigating its risks. Anthony et al. (2024) highlights how AI can enhance creativity, decision-making, and problem-solving when paired with human oversight. McLees et al. (2024) stress that clarity around the roles of both human and machine is key to realizing this potential. Educators and professionals must ensure AI is applied as a supportive tool while continuing to cultivate human-centered skills such as empathy, communication, and adaptability (Essential Skills for Managers: Develop Resilient Employees, 2025).

Even with AI’s growing capabilities, human qualities remain irreplaceable for navigating complexity and fostering ethical decision-making. Developing soft skills has become more, no less, important in the AI era. Students must graduate with technical competencies and be deeply grounded in critical human skills. This partnership model calls for a reconceptualization of system design, one that supports seamless interaction between humans and machines while upholding core human values.

Fostering Collaborative Ecosystems: Recommendations for Building Bridges

To fully harness the power of collaboration in the AI era, we must foster ecosystems that connect diverse stakeholders across disciplines, sectors, and geographies. These ecosystems must be intentional, inclusive, and grounded in ethical practice. The following recommendations offer actionable strategies to support this vision:

Implement AI Integration Frameworks Using Practical Case Studies 

Institutions must move beyond experimental use of AI and adopt structured, context-specific frameworks that guide AI implementation across teaching, administration, and student support. These should be based on proven case studies, with clear timelines, resource allocation, and measurable outcomes (Hughes & Davis, 2024; Zeivots & Shalavin, 2024).

Strengthen Interdisciplinary Education to Bridge Knowledge Silos 

Curricula should integrate technical and social dimensions of AI. Courses like “AI and Society” or “Technology and Ethics” prepare students to address real-world challenges holistically and work effectively in cross-functional teams (L. Thomas & Ambrosini, 2021).

Build Educator Capacity with Targeted AI Training and Ongoing Support 

Educators need professional development on AI tools and pedagogy. Institutions should provide training, mentoring, and access to updated AI modules to ensure faculty remain current and confident in AI-enhanced teaching (Lawler et al., 2025; Petriglieri, 2025).

Create Cross-Institutional Collaborative Research Platforms 

Universities should develop digital platforms for collaborative research across regions and disciplines. These platforms must prioritize the inclusion of underrepresented institutions to ensure equitable innovation (Purdy, 2024).

Promote Industry–Academia Hubs Focused on Responsible AI 

Collaborative hubs where academia and industry co-create AI solutions ensure relevance and accountability. These spaces should emphasize ethical design and transparent deployment of AI (Gelfand et al., 2017; Kuvshinikov, 2022)

Shift Reward Systems to Favor Collaboration over Competition 

Academic culture must evolve to value interdisciplinary and collaborative achievements. Promotion and funding structures should reward joint publications and shared impact (L. Thomas & Ambrosini, 2021)

Foster Urban–Rural Educational Partnerships on AI Projects 

Urban institutions can share technical resources with rural counterparts through cloud-based platforms and joint research, helping bridge digital and knowledge divides (Kuvshinikov, 2022; Petriglieri, 2025).

Embed Socio-Digital Skills in Curriculum Design 

Programs should intentionally include training in virtual collaboration, ethical tech use, and intercultural communication to prepare students for hybrid work environments (Hughes & Davis, 2024).

Invest in Digital Collaboration Infrastructure 

Governments and institutions must ensure equitable access to high-speed internet, cloud storage, and virtual tools—particularly in underserved regions (Hincapie & Hill, 2024).

Mandate Cultural Intelligence Training for Collaborative Projects 

Cultural intelligence is critical to successful cross-border teamwork. CQ training should be embedded into curricula and faculty development initiatives (Hincapie & Hill, 2024; Ravasi et al., 2024).

Institutionalize Ethical Frameworks in AI Research and Deployment 

All AI development should be guided by ethics committees and governance frameworks that prioritize fairness, transparency, and inclusivity (Purdy, 2024).

Encourage Human-Centered AI System Design 

Designing AI with users in mind—prioritizing accessibility, equity, and empowerment—is key to building trust and long-term adoption (Hughes & Davis, 2024; Zeivots & Shalavin, 2024).

Build a Culture of Lifelong Learning for Future Collaboration Readiness 

Institutions must support modular learning, certifications, and AI literacy programs to ensure all stakeholders can adapt to rapid technological change (Green et al., 2025; Roberto, 2024)

Conclusion, Limitations, and Future Research

This study examined how collaboration can be optimized to navigate the rapid integration of artificial intelligence into academic and professional contexts, guided by the lenses of Cultural Intelligence (CQ) and Soft Systems Methodology (SSM). CQ provided the foundation for understanding and addressing the cultural complexities inherent in interdisciplinary and cross-border collaboration, while SSM offered a process-oriented framework for diagnosing problems, engaging stakeholders, and co-developing systemic, human-centered solutions. Our reviews highlight the importance of fostering culturally intelligent, ethically grounded, and structurally supportive collaborative ecosystems. We emphasized strategies such as interdisciplinary learning, digital infrastructure investment, ethical AI design, and educator capacity-building as vital enablers of responsible and inclusive AI adoption.

However, this study is not without limitations. As a conceptual and reflective piece, it lacks empirical testing. Future research should explore the practical application of CQ and SSM in collaborative educational settings, especially across diverse socio-economic and cultural contexts. Longitudinal studies could examine the sustained impact of AI on pedagogy, student learning outcomes, and the evolving role of educators in hybrid learning environments. The study offers practical recommendations, but these remain theoretical. Future research should assess their implementation and impact using measurable indicators.

Although we reflect on our own collaborative experience, the study does not empirically evaluate the effectiveness or pedagogical outcomes of cross-border collaboration in AI-integrated environments. Further investigation is needed into how cross-border collaborations influence teaching practices and how educators adapt to AI-augmented roles. Additionally, our analysis emphasizes student and institutional dimensions of AI integration, with less attention to the evolving role, preparedness, and support needs of educators in
AI-enabled collaboration.

The future of education and work is not a binary of human versus machine but a dynamic collaboration between both. As we build bridges between cultures, disciplines, and intelligence, CQ and SSM offer critical pathways to ensure that these efforts are inclusive, adaptive, and ethically sound. Our hope is that these theoretical frameworks will continue to inform empirical research and guide institutions toward more resilient and human-centered AI integration.

References

  • Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(10), 12-22.
  • Ahmad, S. F., Alam, M. M., Rahmat, M. K., Mubarik, M. S., & Hyder, S. I. (2022). Academic and administrative role of artificial intelligence in education. Sustainability, 14(3), 1101.
  • Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(3), 431-440.
  • Alam, A. (2021, December). Should robots replace teachers? Mobilization of AI and learning analytics in education. In 2021 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, and Control (ICAC3) (pp. 1-12). IEEE.
  • Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335–371.
  • Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Rockstuhl, T. (2015). Cultural intelligence: Origins, conceptualization, evolution, and methodological diversity. In M. J. Gelfand, C.-Y. Chiu, & Y.-Y. Hong (Eds.), Handbook of advances in culture and psychology, Vol. 5, pp. 273–323). Oxford University Press
  • Anis, M. (2023). Leveraging artificial intelligence for inclusive English language teaching: strategies and implications for learner diversity. Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research, 12(6).
  • Anthony, S. D., Caputo, T., Solis, F., & Sutton, T. (2024). When It Comes to Gen AI, Let Your Students Play. Harvard Business Publishing Education.
  • Bavel, J. V., & Kriska, L. (n.d.). 4 Research-Backed Ways to Help Your Team Collaborate Better. Harvard Business Review.
  • Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and artificial intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068.
  • Brad Rose Consulting. (2019). Robots grade your essays and read your resumes | Brad Rose Consulting | Programme Evaluation | MA. https://bradroseconsulting.com/robots-grade- your-essays-and-read-your-resumes/
  • Ceurvorst, S. C., LaRocca-Cerrone, K., Mazumdar, A., & Naski, A. (2024). Why Cross-Functional Collaboration Stalls, and How to Fix It.
  • Chalutz-Ben Gal, H. (2023). Person–Skill Fit: Why a New Form of Employee Fit Is Required. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2022.0024
  • Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278.
  • Chin, R. T. (2018). Education in the artificial intelligence era. QS WOWNEWS.
  • Earley, P. C., & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures. Stanford University Press.
  • Essential Skills for Managers: Develop Resilient Employees. (2025). [Business report]. Udemy Business. 
  • Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Oxford Martin School Publications, 37-38. 
  • García-Vélez, R., Moreno, B. V., Ruiz-Ichazu, A., Rivera, D. M., & Rosero-Perez, E. (2021). Automating the generation of study teams through genetic algorithms based on learning styles in higher education. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 1213 AISC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51328-3_38.
  • Gelfand, M. J., Aycan, Z., Erez, M., & Leung, K. (2017). Cross-cultural industrial organizational psychology and organizational behavior: A hundred-year journey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 514–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000186
  • Green, C., Pranikoff, K., & Weissbourd, R. (2025, January 22). Teaching Students to Listen 
  • Across Differences _ Harvard Business Publishing Education. Harvard Business Publishing Education.
  • Heaster, D. (2022, November 1). The Campus of Tomorrow Changing the Classroom for the Future of Work. Transformation Journal of Business.
  • Hincapie, M. X., & Hill, N. S. (2024). The Impact of Team Virtuality on the Performance of On-Campus Student Teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 23(1), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2022.0397
  • Hughes, H. P. N., & Davis, M. C. (2024). Preparing a Graduate Talent Pipeline for the Hybrid Workplace: Rethinking Digital Upskilling and Employability. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 23(4), 578–599. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2023.0106
  • Krupa, C. (2025, January 30). Companies are rolling back diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. Here’s why. Time. https://time.com/7209960/companies-rolling-back-dei/
  • Kuvshinikov, J. T. (2022). The Campus of Tomorrow: Transforming Students into Resilient Leaders of Tomorrow through Remote Real World Consulting Projects. The Transformational Journal of Business. 
  • Lawler, B., D’Silva, V., & Arora, V. (2025). What Companies Succeeding with AI Do Differently. Harvard Business Review. 
  • Mallillin, L. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) towards students’ academic performance. Innovare Journal of Education,12(4),16-21.
  • McLees, T., Radziwill, N., & Satell, G. (2024). How to Create Value Systematically with Gen AI. Harvard Business Review.
  • Muhdi, P. L. (2023). Statkraft: Building a culture of collaboration in A fast-growing state-owned company. International Institute for Management Development, IMD-7-2432. 
  • Peras,.C.M.B, Aviluna, J.M, Barbadillo,N.R.A, Canoy, A.T, Eslet,.M.E. R, Española,.J.B.O,  
  • Miras,L.J.R &  Nepangue,. J. (2023). Artificial intelligence as a tool in increasing academic performance. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 3(6), 1151-1155.
  • Petriglieri, G. (2025, January). Three Ways to Lead Learning. Harvard Business Review.
  • Purdy, M. (2024). What Is Agentic AI, and How Will It Change Work? Harvard Business Review.
  • Ravasi, D., Zhu, J., Wan, W., Dorobantu, S., & Gruber, M. (2024). What Makes Research Collaborations Successful? Advice from AMJ Authors. Academy of Management Journal, 67(3), 583–594. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2024.4003
  • Roberto, M. (2024). HelpsStudents think critically in the age of AI. Harvard Business Publishing Education.
  • Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. M., Hakanen, J., & Salanova, M. (2021). Building efficacy beliefs through team task engagement and past task performance in contemporary teams. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 24(2), 129–142. 
  • Rosani, G., Farri, E., & Renecle, M. (2024). To Mitigate Gen AI’s Risks, Draw on Your Team’s Collective Judgment. Harvard Business Review.
  • Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
  • Salas, E., Linhardt, R., & Fernández Castillo, G. (2024). The Science (and practice) of teamwork: a Commentary on Forty Years of Progress…. Small Group Research, 0(0).  
  • Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., Lim, W. L., Yang, X., & Khan, Q. R. (2024). Artificial intelligence and social media on academic performance and mental well-being. Elsevier, 10(10), 1-17.
  • Shiyun, O. (2024). Transforming Education: The evolving role of artificial intelligence in The Students Academic Performance. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 13(2), 163-173.
  • Slimi, Z. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: An empirical study. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(1), 17-33.
  • Thomas, L., & Ambrosini, V. (2021). The Future Role of the Business School: A Value Cocreation Perspective. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 20(2), 249–269.
  • Thomas, R. J. (2011). Collaboration as an Intangible Asset. Harvard Business Review. 
  • Tuomi, I. (2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on learning, teaching, and education. Policies for the future. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. 
  • University of Bridgeport. (2023, December 18). How AI is impacting the job market for college graduates. University of Bridgeport. https://www.bridgeport.edu/news/how-ai-is-impacting-the-job-market-for-college-graduates/
  • Zeivots, S., & Shalavin, C. A. (2024). Codesigning Meaningful Engagement with Online Course Readings: Implications for Teaching Management Courses. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 23(2), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2022.0364